Cytat: Anatoliy Golitsyn worked inside the system, inside the KGB. He predicted what later has become reality – Russia clearly staged the. Golitsyne; nnwiki Anatolij Mikhailovitsj Golitsyn; plwiki Anatolij Golicyn; sqwiki Anatolij Golicin; svwiki Anatolij Golitsyn; ukwiki Голіцин Анатолій Михайлович. Radziecki dezerter Anatolij Golicyn próbował ostrzec świat o tym wielkim rosyjskim oszustwie w latach poprzez swoje kontakty w Centralnej.
|Published (Last):||19 February 2014|
|PDF File Size:||4.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.51 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Trzy etapy i co dalej? To nie jest doprawdy dziwne. Nic nie jest bardziej oczywiste.
Czy rosyjska kultura jest wielka? Tak, podobnie jak kultura niemiecka. Zostaniecie zdeptani przez rosyjskie buty. Could someone, please, deal with this nonsense? I mean the comment. I will gladly reply to the main article. Any language will do, even Mandarin….
Otherwise, he would never be allowed to become President of Poland. After all, he killed times more Communists than Hitler, Pinochet and Franco combined….
Well, definitely not with Pat Buchanan, who is anti-Communist, but very pro-Russian… And his hatred of Poles wheather Communist or not is beyond pathological…. Bakowski is consistent and logical, if you make the inferences and assumptions he takes for granted. The communists planned the charade, as you say. Golitsyn himself explained in the mids that the strategy was behind schedule.
Furthermore, in determining where we stand today, it is foolish to rely on logic alone. We must rely on empirical observation as well, venturing from the womb of deductive validity.
Of course, there is no established scheme for inductive validity. We must must be detectives, which is not easy. This requires keen judgment, and will lead us into more serious discussions.
A defector from the GRU that I know, gave the following analysis a few years ago. He said that there definitely was a Soviet plan to collapse communism. It was absolutely clear to him, especially in terms of its future military exploitation. This plan encountered a major problem, however, in that Marxism-Leninism was more feeble than the planners anticipated.
This spelled vulnerability throughout. Stuck with the false democratic facade created inthe Soviet strategists would have to combat decay and drift by reverting to a red-brown political alliance; by the addition of national socialism, and anti-Americanism.
The deception policy has been socially destructive for Russia, while preserving certain totalitarian options. The policy has also encouraged a confused pattern of debate, discussion and interpretation inside and outside the country.
Anatoliy Golitsyn – Wikipedia
The deception is not as important as preventing the demoralization of essential Russian cadres. What may save the strategy, as it increeasingly becomes stuck with the above themes, is Barack Obama. As for Pat Buchanan, his version of nationalism mixed with historical revisionism has led him to a position of anti-U.
This is what we find, by the way, among U. Their ideology prevents them from seeing the real objects which menace their country and the world. Can I retire now?
Golitsyn, Anatoliy 1926-
Now that I know that you admire me? What else is there for me to achive? As so many times before, you encapsulate the thought in anatollij words: There is also one important difference between Macierewicz and the twins: As golicjn teh subject matter, I will have the honour of golicjn to your article separately.
Let me just make a formal point here. I happen not to take things for granted, quite the opposite actually, I question rather more than is good for me. When I make inferences and assumptions I try to state that it is so. But what astonished me in your statement was the suggestion that one needs to make assumptions or to take them for granted to appear consistent and logical.
As everyone knows, one can start with wrong assumptions, proceed logically and arrive at false conclusions. You are undoubtedly right, though, that it would be foolish to rely on logic alone.
And we surely do not. But as a philosopher once said: Once logic is sacrificed we are left with pseudo-thoughts of the kind presented in one of the comments above: To equate communist with Russian is shameful and, frankly, stupid. Learn to fight, buy yourself a gun legally for Christ sake and learn to use it. But, Jeff, when you are disseminating that painful truth about the American inability, try to avoid the trap of easy solution. As a resident of Eastern Europe, I can say with some certainty: Among others new brilliant anti-communist figures, you mentioned one Mikheil Saakashvili, so called president of the Georgia Republic.
Knowing your views for the last 12 years or so I could not believe when I first saw your new stance. Can you really think about Saakashvili with such company around as the trustworthy politician, a man who in some degree could turn the fate of the free world? I do not believe it! In last article you wrote that Mr. I have no idea what he is planning to do, but I think his stance does not require as much explanation as yours because, to my mind, you seem to have changed your viewpoint quite radically.
The level of attention he drew is at the same level as Sarah Palin does in USA as you can see here http: I am not saying that Poland or Ukraine or Georgia is going to save civilization. I merely said there are positive developments, and there is a struggle in which things are happening that could not happen in the U. As for the defeat of the U.
This does not mean that Bolicyn is permanently eliminated from the equation. And I never never said victory will be easy. Finally, your indictment of Saakashvili is not adequate. Given what has happened, you need more. Your method is to assume that holicyn of a communist leader glicyn turn against him. There is a break here. Perhaps it is the case that either I do not understand Soviet strategy, and you understand it much better than I.
We need a more detailed study of all these questions. Jeff, in my opinion what you say here can be understood if a person has some real life experience in political struggle or God forbid was persecuted in some way. Saakashvilli was a student in Columbia university that is like in a walking distance from where i live.
My distant relative was a doctor who treated family of one of the top soviet leaders in the 30s of last century. And for the proof: A friend once told me: I decidedly agree with you — we need more detailed study of all these questions. Therefore the only tools in our possession are: The answer seems to be: But this is only pure propaganda, nothing else.
We can trace many events and many players day by day and some times more. It helps a lot to integrate our knowledge and exchange opinions which we do and it yielded significant results. Yushenko was never in a conflict with Yanukovich: Unfortunately it was not achieved. Most likely Tymoshenko went through kgb school herself in the late gollcyn.
The Perestroika Deception – Anatolij Golicyn – Prawda2
Thas why the discussion like this is so important. It seems that a known kgb operator Radek Sikorski has a double support from moscow and their influential friends in Washington, people like Clintons, Rice, Brzezinski and the rest of their gang: There are some good people that work against kgb with limited success.
And most of the work is done underground. In Ukraine as far as we know a number of politicians who are anatoij russian on the surface actually are proven to be anticommunist in their important policies but it is not very much understood by general public. For instance gplicyn Kuchma in was getting very close to cut an oil deal with Azerbaijan.
As soon as it was acknowledged by kremlin as a threat a provocation was developed and Kuchma was later accused of murder. Yushchenko created a massive campaign on it. It is absolutely unprecedented and has a profound long lasting effect on national conscience. And this is the best possible protection he could deliver to his nation in terms of preventing russian aggression.
Why do you demand from him not to use word russian for what is russian and always was and will be for a long time an enemy to Poland and Ukraine and USA. The open letter to Macierewicz require explanations.
I lok into it right now and can not make any sense at all. In politics there is a big factor of mass conscience at play.