ANATOLY FOMENKO HISTORY FICTION SCIENCE PDF
Anatoly T. Fomenko History: Fiction or Science? Apocalypse was written after a.d. Dr Prof Anatoly Fomenko and team dissect Almagest of “ancient”. Fomenko states, is that human history only stretches back to around CE. Most of what we call ancient history (before ) is a modern invention. We have. The New Chronology is a pseudohistorical theory which argues that the conventional . In volumes 1, 2, 3 and 4 of History: Fiction or Science?, Fomenko and his . In at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his.
|Published (Last):||9 February 2006|
|PDF File Size:||10.47 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.5 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Astronomical data therein contained is sufficient for unique dating. The New Chronology is rejected by mainstream historians and is inconsistent with absolute and relative dating techniques used in the wider scholarly community.
Beam writes that Fomenko and his colleagues were discovered by the Anatoky scientific press in the early s, leading to “a brief period of renown”; a contemporary review from the Soviet journal Questions of History complained, “Their constructions have nothing in common with Marxist historical science. Fomenko made a massive timeline — a “Global Chronology Map” — detailing the academically-accepted historical timeline.
Central to Fomenko’s New Chronology is his claim of the existence of a vast Slav-Turk empire, which he called the “Russian Horde”, which he says played the dominant role in Eurasian history before the 17th century. But until now there is no answer to the question: Submit a new link.
New Chronology (Fomenko) – Wikipedia
The second and most famous “New Rome” is Constantinople. Chapters II, III and IV contain abundant astronomical proof from the ancient Egyptian zodiacs, Ptolemy’s Almagest, and the Apocalypse, demonstrating that all datings of ‘ancient’ eclipses are either medieval or fake.
This series crowns 30 years of research by Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. It is surprising, to say the least, that a well-known Dutch publisher could produce an expensive book of such doubtful intellectual value, of which the only good word that can be said is that it contains an enormous sdience of factual historical material, untidily ordered, true; badly written, yes; mixed-up with conjectural nonsense, sure; but ofmenko, much useful stuff.
Submit a new link. Billington describes Fomenko as ascribing the belief in past hostility between Russia and the Mongols to the influence of Western historians.
So say he was going soft in his old age, or that his brilliance did not extend this far, but it is still an interesting Ally to have in questioning traditional chronology. All these items are precisely grouped and decomposed in a strict chronological order.
[Anatoly Fomenko] History: Fiction or Science (Complete 22 Volume E-Book Series) : CulturalLayer
The theory emerged alongside other alternate histories and conspiracy literature in the period of increased freedom of speech that followed the break-up of the Soviet Union.
Bear with the subtitles; this is arguably the Holy Grail of New Chronology. But we still have domenko chance to restore the truth.
Graybill, “Dendrochronology of Bristlecone Pine: This is some wild stuff. Constantinople againRome in Italy, and Moscow. Not to be confused with New Chronology Rohl.
Scientific books and museum expositions, historical novels and films convince us that nearly everything is known about the history of mankind and nearly on every question of a curious mind historians will definitely find a ready answer. Fomenko claims the Hagia Sophia is actually the biblical Temple of Solomon. They also note that his method of statistically correlating of texts is very rough, because it does not take into account the many possible sources of variation in length outside of “importance”.
He identifies Solomon as sultan Suleiman the Magnificent — Log in or sign up in seconds. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
The New Testament was written before the Old, both exposed as fomsnko to mediaeval events. For the rest of the book is absolutely worthless.
Newton’s analysis has since been criticized as suffering “from two fundamental defects. How the ancient architects processed and moved huge stone blocks? It makes you really realize how unquestioned these presumptions are, and how ugly the feuds were over it’s establishment and enshrinement as truth. The Development of the Statistical Tools. The Biblical Jerusalem is identified with the mediaeval Constantinople.
New Chronology (Fomenko)
Want to add to the discussion? Among these texts is a series of Babylonian astronomical diarieswhich records precise astronomical observations of the Moon and planets, often dated in terms of the reigns of known historical figures extending back to the 6th century BCE. In at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his coauthor Gleb Nosovsky were awarded for their books on “New Chronology” the anti-prize called “Abzatz” literally ‘paragraph’, a Russian slang word meaning ‘disaster’ or ‘fiasco’ in the category “Pochotnaya bezgramota” the term is a pun upon “Pochotnaya gramota” Certificate of Honor and may be translated either “Certificate of Dishonor” or literally, “Respectable Illiteracy” for the worst book published in Russia.
Then, he creates “survey codes” for each pair of the rulers, which contain a number which describes degree of the match of each considered property of two rulers. Critics point out that Fomenko’s discussion of astronomical phenomena tends to be selective, choosing isolated examples that support the New Chronology and ignoring the large bodies of data that provide statistically supported evidence for the conventional dating.
But this didn’t happen until now, and that’s why involuntarily appears a question: Chapters V and VI contain indepth descriptions of the research methods used.